<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academic Aesthetic 165: Twitter vs Plurk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://academicaesthetic.com/2008/08/06/academic-aesthetic-165-twitter-vs-plurk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://academicaesthetic.com/2008/08/06/academic-aesthetic-165-twitter-vs-plurk/</link>
	<description>Art.  Education.  Technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:38:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Dembo</title>
		<link>http://academicaesthetic.com/2008/08/06/academic-aesthetic-165-twitter-vs-plurk/comment-page-1/#comment-15907</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Dembo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 11:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://academicaesthetic.com/?p=604#comment-15907</guid>
		<description>Heh, for a minute there I was worried that you were going to compare ME to other people on Twitter that hadn&#039;t made the switch yet!  

I&#039;ve done a few of my own experiments, posting questions in both locations and seeing how many people respond.  Despite having only 10% of the followers there, I&#039;ve been seeing more responses there, and it&#039;s EASIER to read through them because they&#039;re aggregated.  

I&#039;m still using Twitter too, but Plurk is clearly a superior application right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heh, for a minute there I was worried that you were going to compare ME to other people on Twitter that hadn&#8217;t made the switch yet!  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve done a few of my own experiments, posting questions in both locations and seeing how many people respond.  Despite having only 10% of the followers there, I&#8217;ve been seeing more responses there, and it&#8217;s EASIER to read through them because they&#8217;re aggregated.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m still using Twitter too, but Plurk is clearly a superior application right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

