SumoPaint.com, because it as well is free and awesome.
Frames, because while it is not free, it is still awesome.
A rant against looking for things because they “work in the classroom.” That’s great if we’re preparing our students for spending the rest of their lives in our classrooms, but there’s that “real world” thing going on outside. Getting something to work in the classroom is good and necessary, but we should be finding and using things that will work outside of our classrooms as well as in them.
Want to know a secret? A deep, dark secret that I’ve kept off this blog for over a year now? One that will shock you?
Well, too bad. I’m going to tell you anyway.
Ready?
Here I go …
I’m not a part of my school’s Art Department.
Yeah, that shocks me, too. Here’s a guy whose screen name on an umptillion of Web 2.0 sites is “The Art Guy,” who may or may not have been the first art teacher podcaster (at the time I started I couldn’t find another one … that’s far from the case now of course), who isn’t even a part of his own school’s Art Department.
How’d THAT happen?
It’s a bureaucratic issue, to be honest. I teach in a computer lab in a K-8 Arts Academy. If it was a high school, I’d be a Computer Graphics teacher. Unfortunately there is no course number for such a class in middle school, let alone elementary.
Instead, I teach a class called Technology Concepts. It’s a fun class to teach, if you’re as geeky as I am, but it’s not inherently an art course. Therefore, I have no reason (on paper, at least), to be a part of the Art Department. Instead, I’m a part of the Enrichment Department.
It’s not so bad…
I recently was chatting online with a former coworker from a previous school, and she lamented my change of departments.
“I’m so sorry,” she said, “You’re far too talented to not be teaching art!”
At that point I puffed out my chest and my head swelled with pride – and not just because she said I had talent.
“Oh, I’m still teaching art. Do you honestly think I could stop teaching art if I tried?”
Of course she could not.
I’m an art teacher. I teach art.
Your definitions may vary, but in my book, ART is anything that involves creativity. I don’t care if it’s a painting, story, play, song, dance, or video game. An ARTIST is anyone who creates art, and an ART TEACHER is anyone who teaches students how to be artists.
I’m a teacher at a Creative & Performing Arts Academy. Whatever subject is taught by any teacher, they had darned well better be teaching art as well or they don’t belong there.
Math is art.
Science is art.
Social studies is art.
Reading/Language Arts is art to the point that the R/LA Department should be part of the Art Department as well!
Conclusion
Does it sting a bit to know I’m not part of a department named for my degree and certification? Yes, yes it does. But it doesn’t change what I teach.
Art is universal. Only the styles and media change.
No, no that’s not true. For me, School started several weeks ago when I came in during the Summer to put my lab back together. (The custodial staff needed me to break it down so they could move the desks and wax my floors.)
I found out only recently that many of the students I had last year will also be returning. I met this news with mixed feelings. First, I had some awesome kids last year. There was more than one time that I took student work to my principal and said “This is why I need majors.” Seriously, we’re an Arts Academy. We have dance, drama, visual art, chorus, media production, band, AND orchestra majors – why not computer graphics, too?
That may happen in the future, but for now the red tape is in the way.
Unfortunately, for every student who was absolutely thrilled to have my class there was another who was only there because the Guidance dept. needed to give them an elective.
I don’t fault students for not being thrilled with technology. It’s my passion, it doesn’t have to be everyone’s. I was, however, concerned about credit. There have been two other occasions where I’ve had students put in a class after they had already earned credit. In one case discipline problems were a concern.
But then again, I’ve been assured that if the students couldn’t get credit for taking Technology Concepts a second time the scheduling software wouldn’t have let them into my class.
And it’s not like I’m teaching all the same lessons again, either. As technology and my own skill sets evolve, so do the projects I assign. Granted, some lessons will be repeated – every class starts with students using PowerPoint to introduce themselves to the class – but others were already on the chopping block not because they were old news to the students (I didn’t know I’d have returning students yet), but because they were old news to me.
The media we use will still be the same. Students will still create animations, avatars, wallpapers, posters, and more. I don’t think I’m wrong for repeating those things so long as there’s something new about them. After all, I doubt the chorus majors will be saying “But we sang songs LAST year!”
I just have to keep things interesting, but you know what?
The photo above is the front wall of my school. On the day I stopped by to interview for my position (one of the best career choices I ever made, in my honest opinion), I saw this wall and thought “If I was a few decades younger, I’d try climbing that.”
Indeed, with all of those bricks pushed away from the flat surface, this wall was full of hand holds and toe holds. Perfect for climbing, except for the concrete and asphalt below you.
No, I never tried to climb that wall. After a childhood accident where I fell off a porch railing and broke a wrist I decided not to climb things where I could severely hurt myself. (I did later go cliff diving – repeatedly – but water landings aren’t so bad.)
Flash forward to our school’s end-of-the-year field day celebration. A couple enterprising students looked at that wall and had the same thoughts I had – without the “Oh, we could probably really hurt ourselves” thoughts to go with them.
Fortunately these students were far from unsupervised, and stern words and looks managed to stop them before they got more than a couple feet off the ground.
So what does this have to do with education?
Everything.
My experience kept me from climbing that wall, and my experience kept those students from doing the same. They hadn’t yet learned that the benefit of climbing that wall (“Look how high I am!” “Look what I can do!”) was overshadowed by the drawback of a potential injury.
Switch gears to a Kindergarten classroom, where the teacher has decided not to let her kids use oil pastels because the benefits of learning a new media do not (in his or her mind) outweigh the drawbacks of potential hard to clean messes.
Switch again to a classroom where students are not allowed to create blogs because the perceived risks (Do I have to list them?) don’t outweigh the perceived benefits.
I’ve seen many teachers, administrators, and parents that thought of climbing a brick wall with no safety gear in the same light as student blogging, cell phones in schools, oil pastels in Kindergarten, or even letting special needs students use scissors.
What’s the difference?
The difference is that we as teachers would be fools to ignore taking proper precautions before a learning activity.
I argue that it’s not the same thing if we keep safety in mind. Let the Kindergarten students use oil pastels after setting out “placemats” (newspaper works fine) and reminding them that when a color is done it goes back in the box. Let students blog in a moderated setting, perhaps even in a “walled garden” environment where only the students, school employees, and parents can see what’s being said.
When a student wants to climb a wall, for goodness’ sake give them a helmet, safety line, and something soft to land on.
Then cheer with them when they see how high they can go.
The last time I attended a session on using games in education I was under whelmed, but I think that was more from the presenter than the subject. I am cautiously optimistic.
First paper handout I’ve seen this conference. Printed PowerPoint slides.
“Let’s start with your Door Prize! … I left it at home.” It was cards for a contest for a game called “Legend of Zork.”
In games the teacher is the guide and students learn through exploration.
“Mirrors how humans think and how the mind works.”
His slides are walls of text. I don’t think it’s hurting his presentation too much though. He’s not just reading the slides, and paging through the handout shows that these are just to front-load background information.
Gaming appeals to multiple intelligences. (Yay, Gardner!)
“Teaches without its main purpose as teaching.”
Can be used to train in low-risk environments. Military, Aviation, Medical, Financial, and so on.
Presented by Roxanne Dean & Linda Jones, both from Baltimore County.
Honestly, could anyone who knows me expect me to attend any other session? It’s Art! It’s Technology! This is what I do.
Demonstrating Voicethread used to teach a lesson on drawing a human face.
“At this point they haven’t thrown me out.” Said RE: How many Voicethread pages she has.
5th graders drew self portraits then turned them into contour line drawings and learned about Andy Worhol.
“Why do you think we need to do this in contour?”
They reproduced their drawings on the computer. No scanning or photography? Would be nice to have the time for that. In my case I may have to use something like this to digitise student work.
Showing Art Content Standards. Yes, this is an art lesson! It’s not just token “Let’s color something and say we did art!”
Showing lots of Pop Art. Comment about how things that Warhol thought were important are not recognised by today’s kids. Interesting snapshots of the culture at the time.
So apparently Voicethread lets you record video with your voice. That could be helpful for students who are ESOL or have certain disabilities. Seeing someone’s lips move as they talk can certainly help to aid comprehension in some cases. (It helped me in college, especially with some professors who had strong accents.)
A cow is used to signal clean-up time. Students expect it and are used to the routine. Makes me wonder how I might implement a similar strategy – perhaps with a school mascot?
Students used the paint brush tool in Pixie to redraw their line drawings.
Copy/paste used to get 4 identical panels, then the panels were colored separately with the paint bucket. (Watch out for cracks! The colors will leak through!)
While this was done with Pixie, I see how this could be done with other art programs. GIMP, SUMOPaint, TuxPaint, Frames, even! … Am I starting to sound like a broken record?
“Zoho” used to embed art on a site for parents to see progress.
Showing an example made starting with a photo. Apparently the photo needs to be “glued” to keep it from fading. I imagine layer settings could protect it in GIMP/Photoshop/SUMOPaint.
“Photoshop is a little advanced for 5th grade.” Not if my 3rd graders are making vector graphics in Frames. Give me a day or two and they can do it.
A conference is not worthwhile if you don’t find something you can take with you and use the next school day. This presentation is all I need for MSET to be worth it, and it’s only the 2nd session! Can we say this is an awesome conference? Yes we can!
This is possibly one of the smallest rooms I’ve ever been in, and there are few if any empty chairs. Meanwhile the walls are doing little to block out the noise of convention center staff moving things around. Nevertheless, the show must go on.
Created her first animation using Layers in Photoshop, but her school didn’t have Photoshop.
Switched to placing images in PowerPoint.
Suggests PlayDoh for claymation. If the lesson takes a while the PlayDoh can dry out, even with sealing it regularly though. Parafin based clays can be purchased at craft stores and never dry out.
Make sure slides are imported in order – some programs have a fit and put slide 10 in front of slide 2 because 1 is more than 2, right? Watch for that.
Still suggesting Photoshop or Photoshop Elements. On a shoestring budget I’ll use GIMP.org or SUMOPaint.com.
Images not in the rectangle for a PowerPoint slide will not show up. GREAT way to organise elements that will be moving in or out of the frame later.
“Insert -> Duplicate Slide, then move something.” Repeat ad nausium, but it WORKS and students can understand it.
What’s also good about this is if students make the switch to Frames these skills should carry over. Frames is more powerful than PowerPoint but PowerPoint will get the job done with most of the tools you need.
PowerPoint 2008 no longer supports photo editing? Ugh, didn’t they learn when Apple cut features out of iMovie? Hm, apparently they did but they learned the wrong lesson.
Word Art to make titles for your animation – more flexibility than using the built in title generator in iMovie or MovieMaker.
“Save As -> Select JPEG.” Check “Save All” and change the name to prevent overwriting. A simple “ver1,ver2, ver3″ is enough.
“Save often.” Good advice for almost any lesson.
When you import your slides in set the timing for as short as possible and turn Ken Burns Effect off! Honestly, that effect is overused and makes your animation into an earthquake simulation.
You don’t need to use clip art – you can draw things with Autoshapes, also.
Animations imported into PowerPoint will not be animated when exported as JPEG files. Don’t bother playing with transitions in PowerPoint.
“Do we have enough time?” We have 20 minutes left. She breezed through.
The video she’s showing is very amusing and a mix of live action and animation.
Did she just call GIMP “Free shareware?” She did. It’s not shareware. It’s just free.
Today an email started floating around amongst various fellow employees of my school district. It contained a link to a particular YouTube video along with the caption “This video needs to be shown to teachers!”
I thought it was worth tweeting, and apparently I think it’s worth a blog post as well because here we are.
On the surface it’s a very upbeat video. “I can do this!” “You can do this!” The part that’s left out is the part that belongs to the viewer.
Each of us brings to every new experience all of our baggage. Our previous education, experiences, likes, dislikes, and so on all flavor how we react to something new. This can make us more or less inclined to enjoy the new things we encounter.
Having grown up with the idea of a particular type of vampire, for example, I am less inclined to enjoy the concept of vampires introduced in a certain popular series of books and movies. (I still maintain that Vampire + Sunlight = Charcoal. Glitter is not in the equation.)
A student introduced to a certain author or story genre in an academic setting may become soured towards those things if they dislike that classroom environment.
A teacher may avoid technology integration in their classroom if the examples they see implemented are too complex to understand, require too much additional work to pull off, or (in a worst case scenario) involve someone getting punished in some way for implementing the integration incorrectly.
And I begin to get to my point.
When I was a traveling visual arts teacher, I enjoyed the fact that I was not only demonstrating easy ways to integrate the arts but also easy ways to integrate technology. Slideshows, DE Streaming, audio, video, document cameras, and more were thrown in whenever I could do it quickly and easily. In some cases I – the itinerant – was using equipment that the teachers based in those buildings never touched, because they didn’t know it was there or didn’t think it would be better than the old way of doing things.
Now that I am in the same computer lab for the entire day I’m actually much more isolated than I was before, but I can still get a sense of what’s going on. Now, as before, I enter classrooms to see computers collecting dust or surrounded by enough books and boxes to make it obvious they haven’t been used in a while. I see SMART Boards and document cameras pushed aside in the corner of a room. I see LCD projectors that have been used more often to show movies during indoor recess than to actively engage students in learning activities.
On the other hand, there are also plenty of teachers in my building that enjoy using their SMART Boards on a daily basis and are having their students use them, too. There are teachers that encourage their students to use online resources both in and outside of the classroom. There are teachers that frantically contact me when their LCD projectors are not working properly, because their lessons depend on them. There are teachers coming to me and asking for advice on how to get their students blogging, how to create online quizzes, and how to have students submit assignments digitally. And the number of teachers who are like this is growing.
Why? Because the teachers in my building are sharing with each other. They attend their collaborative planning meetings every week and talk about how useful these tools are, and the other teachers decide to give it a try for themselves.
No one day professional development session that I’ve seen will make as much of a difference as one impassioned person who likes to show off what they can do with these awesome tools on a frequent basis. They are enough to get others to try it, and from there it spreads exponentially.
This is a far cry from a former principal of mine (whom I will not name) who attended a MICCA (now MSET) conference only to say “It’s a shame we can’t do any of that here.” (As someone who has presented at MICCA for years on what I’d been doing with my own classes I wondered what sessions she attended.)
So what are you doing? Are you trying new things? Bragging about what works? Trying to fix what doesn’t work? Showing others how the costs of integration are far outweighed by the benefits? If you’re not letting others know how technology works for you, you’re not doing enough to help the next generation.
We all bring our prior experiences with us. At your next collaborative planning, bring some good ones.