There Were Already Good, Open Source Alternatives

Last month AI started making the news in a new, horrible way: Some guy is vibe-coding copies of popular commercial software and releasing it as “open source.” PetaPixel has more information about this train wreck, if you’re interested.

Said person also seems to really dislike the stuff that’s out there in the open source community already, according to Tech Radar. I can understand why, since reputable open source projects like LibreOffice tout a lack of AI code as a feature. If the best you can do is have an AI plagiarize code for you while telling you you’re brilliant, you’re going to get snippy at the people who want you to actually understand the “work” you’re trying to say you did.

You may have guessed, but I don’t like anything about this. Sure, I’ve no love for Adobe or Microsoft, but slopified copies are not inherently better and they seem to be getting tons of publicity right now.

This isn’t one of those cases where I invoke the “let them fight” meme from Godzilla, because I don’t want either of them to win and ONE of them seems to be winning just by existing in the present news cycle.

OK, calming down, now. Mostly.

Instead of continuing to rant, how about I share some tools I’ve been using, in some cases for literal decades, as alternatives to the “big tech” things that have been getting progressively worse. This won’t be an exhaustive list, just a few of the ones I use most often.

And yes, I use all of these on Linux, but most/all of what’s mentioned here has versions that also run on Windows and Mac.

Inkscape instead of Adobe Illustrator

If I could have only one digital visual art tool on my computer, this would be it. It’s my go-to for anything involving vector graphics. I keep getting told that my students NEED to know Adobe Illustrator by people who think being the “industry standard” means you have to work for them to keep them the industry standard. I teach my students to use Inkscape because those people are wrong.

Kdenlive instead of Adobe Premiere

For a long while my goto video editor was Openshot, but I’ve been using Kdenlive for a few years now and I don’t see any reason to go back. It does everything I need out of a video editor, including captions, chroma key, key frames, color correction, and so much more. If it had a “Truncate Silence” tool like Tenacity has I’d use it as my default audio editor as well.

LibreOffice instead of Microsoft Office

The software so despised by the affore-not-mentioned vibe coder that he called it out by name, I’ve been using LibreOffice and, before that, its predecessor, OpenOffice, since I was a MacOS user in the early days of this website.

My employer is mostly a Google Docs shop at this point, but every now and then a legacy MS Office file is needed for one reason or another. None of my coworkers know I’m using LibreOffice instead of Google Docs or MS Office unless I tell them, which is important when you’re aiming for compatibility between software suites.

Tenacity instead of Adobe Audition

This is my go-to audio editor. I used to use Audacity, but that open source project was bought by a for-profit company and I jumped ship early on. Tenacity is a fork of Audacity that keeps things as they were – usable, with no AI. They had a bit of a rough start at first, but that was years ago and it’s been a blast to use ever since.

Their absolute best feature is the “Truncate Silence” effect, which I use to automate removing long pauses from a recorded conversation. Some of my podcasts are over 2 hours long before editing, and running that once can cut out a half hour or more in tiny little chunks spread throughout. It’s not done with AI! The tool was inherited from the Audacity code and predates AI slop by a decade or more. I used to have to do that by hand back when I used Garageband.

Waterfox instead of Chrome or Firefox

Google makes the primary browser for accessing the internet, especially when you realize most of the alternatives are built using Chrome and therefore have a lot of the same problems.

A lot of us switched to Firefox, but the people in charge of it seem dead set on adding AI “features” that we don’t want and have to jump through hoops to disable.

That’s where Waterfox comes in. It’s based on Firefox, not Chrome, but the people behind it have torn out/disabled the AI nonsense and added more privacy tools. There’s even a built-in adblocker, though all the Firefox plugins like uBlock Origin still work.

When Upgrading Isn’t Needed

Alysa Gavilan has an article on DIY Photography asking what happens when you stop buying new cameras. As is my way, I’m not summarizing that here. I’m just using that article as a jumping off point for my own thoughts, and pointing out where the inspiration is from as a way of saying thanks.

Considering that my DSLR of choice is a Nikon D5100 (a camera that was first announced in 2011), I can tell you: You learn to use the equipment you have and get to keep your money.

Well, mostly. There’s footnotes to both sides of that conjunction.

The Money

It’s been said that every hobby’s a bottomless pit that one tries to fill with money. Even if you pick something low cost, like, say, local nature walks, you end up getting more comfortable shoes, hiking poles, maybe a nice camera to photograph what you find along the way…

Oh, yeah, cameras. We were talking about cameras.

Point is, if you have something in your hobby where you say “I don’t need to toss money here,” you’re likely to find something else that looks like it has lots of room for cash. I bought my refurbished DSLR in 2022, and since then I’ve replaced the camera bag twice, snagged a half-decent telephoto lens, and let’s not talk about tripods right now.

Still, I have the money to do that because I’m not buying $600+ cameras every time there’s a new innovation.

And yeah, $600 is an entry level price, at best. The review sites I follow keep talking about new cameras that cost thousands as if they’re good deals. for some people, they are, but we’re talking here about how Olympic athletes will have custom outfits designed to best reduce wind resistance. I am so far removed from that level of innovation.

I just want more control over how I can take pretty pictures, and I have that with my 15 year old camera.

The Learning

If I upgraded to a new DSLR or one of the mirrorless models people really like these days, I’d have a new interface, new button placement, and likely new options to confuse me and get in the way of taking a good photo. For how I use my 5100, I know where all the buttons are that I want to use.

OK, adjusting the ISO’s a bit of a pain, but I learned photography back when you had to grab a new roll of film to change your ISO, so it’s still an upgrade.

But this doesn’t mean I know how to do everything with the camera. I know the features I use most often, but because photography is a hobby first I haven’t sat down to integrate every knob, dial, and menu setting into my mental image of my image saver. I likely never will, because given the option I’d rather keep taking the kinds of photos I enjoy taking, and I know how to do that.

Final Thoughts

Far be it from me to tell you to avoid upgrading a camera if you can afford a newer one and really, REALLY want one. (I still think you should buy used, but I’ve written enough about that for now.)

As for me, I don’t just have a camera that does what I need. I have one that has room to upgrade (lenses, mic, etc.) and more buttons to learn.

I still listen to the PetaPixel podcast when they review new cameras, but never with the idea that I should seriously consider whatever they’re really fond of that week.* It’s oddly freeing to keep an eye on a market when you know you don’t have to be part of it.

*(OK, I did buy some Camp Snap stuff after they talked about it, but it was in spite of their reviews, not because of it.)

How Mood Boards Were Killed For Me

SLR Lounge has a decent article on why and how someone should use a mood board. It makes some good points, even if I have historically refused to use it for my own work.

TL;DR version: It boils down to copyright theft ruining things, but nuance gets boiled off to get it to a soundbite as simple as that.

My first degree is in Art Ed, but to get one of those my university required so many Level 1 courses that specialization just wasn’t a thing, and even then a lot of stuff was left out. (I took a ceramics course, for example, but never got to load a kiln until I was student teaching.) Anything involving graphic design or even taking a class that expected me to set foot in a computer lab was unheard of.

(Granted, this was the ’90s. Things have likely changed.)

So the first time I encountered anything like a mood board was when Pintrest was new.

My experience was … disappointing.

I went in thinking Pintrest would be an artist tool, and it had the potential for that, but with no prior training or experience I looked at it like someone seeing scissors who thinks “Yeah, I could probably use that to tighten a screw.”

I expected a site where I could share things I made. Instead it was a site where one “pinned” things that helped build inspiration and a sense of a target aesthetic.

Oh, and very little effort in regards to crediting creators. A lot of that.

Mostly that.

If Pintrest was an entirely offline tool, this wouldn’t have been as much of an issue for me. Personal use is, as stated, personal. But Pintrest was and still is public. Boards were shared and copied with no regard for who made what.

For over a decade, I’ve said Pintrest is where copyright goes to die.

I can see good uses for mood boards, just not publicly viewable online ones. Someone fills a Word (or in my case, Libre Office) doc or plasters a bulletin board with a bunch of color prints? Great, build things up! The moment it goes online, I remember the bad taste in my mouth.

There’s a thing happening with my school in partnership with a local organization. We’ve been doing things with them for years now and it’s a lot of fun. This year it’s been suggested we build some mood boards to help set expectations. (See that link in the first paragraph? It’s relevant!)

I don’t know if I’ll like the experience, but I need to find a way to have my students learn how things are done without compromising my artistic morals.

I’m sure it’s possible.

We just need to set some expectations.

News Review: October 2026

Often, when I’m perusing my RSS feeds looking to learn things and perhaps be inspired to write something here, I find an article where I’ve nothing to add or I’ve already given my two cents a half-dozen times or more.

Rather than just nod thoughtfully and move on to the next story, I thought I’d share a few of them here. I figure I’ll post a collection like this once a month in order to not overdo it.

PetaPixel: Nikon Disqualifies Winner of Small World in Motion Competition for Using AI

PetaPixel: This Competition Celebrates New Photographers Who Have Been Shooting for Less Than Three Years

PetaPixel: AI-Edited Photos Can Lead People to Form False Memories

PictureCorrect: The Simple Manual Mode Formula for Night Photography

PictureCorrect: 12 Things to Check When Your Photos Aren’t Sharp

PictureCorrect: The Best Aperture Settings for Long Exposure Photography

SLR Lounge: How to critique a photograph

SLR Lounge: The Ultimate Guide to Long Exposure Portraits

SLR Lounge: 7 Steps to Branding For Photographers

SLR Lounge: 12 Creative Photography Ideas & Techniques to Try

SLR Lounge: 6 Night Photography Ideas & Tips You Need to Try

404 Media: How Schools and Universities Try to Censor Student Journalists

EdSurge: Will Kids Pay the Price for AI Panic?

EdSurge: How AI Is Breaking the Way We Reward High-Achieving Students

Education Next: Is Improving Schools from the Bottom Up the Key to Real Reform?

The Hechinger Report: OPINION: Americans are losing faith in shared institutions, but public libraries are one of the few we still trust

Photography Edge Cases

PictureCorrect has a fun photography challenge where you take your shots using a 1/10 second exposure time without a tripod.

This comes at a time when I’ve been looking for more photo lessons to teach my middle school students. I already have one where they take higher speed “frozen in time” shots and much lower speed shots where a tripod is needed, but this isn’t either of those, technically.

That’s one of the neat things about photography. You can get the mechanics down to a science, and most companies do just that, but the art of it frequently comes from knowing all the rules and saying “OK, but what if I did the thing I’m told to never do?”

And let’s face it, just like attempts at this challenge, most of the time that’s not going to work out.

The point isn’t for it to always work. It almost never will. There’s a reason why I tell my students to absolutely never set a shutter speed for 1/30 or slower without using a tripod, even with the many ways you can mitigate camera shake.

But that one time out of 10, or 100, or 1,000 (The aforementioned challenge asks for 30 shots) where it DOES work out, well … you end up talking about that shot for a long time afterwards.

So what are the things I tell my students to do, that I could have them intentionally ignore for a lesson?

  • Use a tripod for low shutter speeds.
  • Follow Rule of Thirds.
  • Don’t put your hands in front of the lens.
  • Don’t hold the camera away from your body.
  • Don’t point the camera at a bright light source.
  • Don’t use the built-in flash.
  • Focus before taking the shot.

If I spent a bit more time on this I could probably get a year’s worth of lessons based entirely on doing what I say not to do, but this is a start.

I’m going to have to type up a few of these.

Limit Choices For More Ideas

The title seems counterintuitive, but it actually works.

R. Schneider’s article over on PictureCorrect gives some great advice on how to get past “photographer’s block.” The advice boils down to looking for specific things, but the examples provided could quickly be turned into a photography unit.

In fact, I might do that.

It makes me think of a specific photography exercise I was told about (but not required to do) when I took a photo class in college: “Lock yourself in a bathroom until you’ve taken 100 unique photos.”

I’m assuming the intentions for that were 100% clean, as I’m sure the bathroom would also be before the first shot was taken. In that class we were fortunately given the less claustrophobic task of agreeing to a single location on campus to go to for our photo assignment.

The point of it is to force the photographer to think more and more about interesting composition. The first 50 photos are standard, run-of-the-mill shots, probably a mirror selfie or two. That’s where the obvious options are checked off.

After that, things get more interesting. Perhaps the camera’s pointing up from inside the cabinet under the sink. Perhaps medicine cabinet items are arranged into a haphazard tower of expired medications.

The last 10-25 shots are golden.

I don’t recommend locking yourself in your bathroom, specifically, but limiting yourself to a single location for 100 shots will definitely force you to think, even if you don’t take them all in one go.

Hit Me With Your Best Shot

An article on PetaPixel by Jeremy Gray has introduced me to grid.photo, a project by Greg Boratyn where users are allowed to post one photo per day.

The limitation is meant to force photographers to only upload their best work, unlike most photo sharing sites where you can post hundreds of images in a day if you want. (Granted, some of them charge for certain volumes of uploads.)

The premise is neat, and though I’ve stopped uploading most of my own photos due to AI scraping nonsense I really hope grid.photo takes off. (You should really read the article, it goes into background not evident from just visiting the site.)

It makes me think about quality vs. quantity in regards to photography. Back in the day [cue old man yelling at cloud voice], if I was fortunate I’d have a roll of 36 possible shots. Not being independently wealthy, I quickly learned I needed to make each one count. I won’t say I managed that, but I spent a lot more time focusing (pun intended) on making each shot as good as possible.

When digital came around, my photos became effectively free. I could take hundreds, maybe thousands (OK, usually only hundreds) of shots in a single outing, deleting all of the superfluous ones.

Or, frequently, sharing 20 shots of the same thing because the photos were near-identical and I couldn’t decide which was “best.”

My father, who bought the first digital camera I ever got to use (a Sony Mavica, if you must know…), occasionally complains about this. He’s certain the way he and I learned photography is better, because of the thought we had to put into each shutter press.

I disagree.

The thought needs to be there, yes, but from the time I pressed the shutter to when I got to see the prints, I often forgot the tiny details I needed to know to make the lesson valuable. Sure, I could have spent my time with the camera taking detailed notes about the aperture, shutter speed, ambient light, and how I was holding the camera, but instead i was spending my time actively taking photos.

My ADHD brain was not going to stand for note taking on a photo excursion when there were pictures that needed taking.

Sure, I sped up the process when I had access to the campus dark room, but that was still enough of a delay for my brain to reset and wipe short term memory.

With most digital cameras (I see you, Camp Snap, and love you for what you are), you get instant gratification, yes, but also instant data.

That shutter speed is too slow.

This image is too dark.

My depth of field isn’t deep (or shallow) enough.

Oh, look, a histogram.

Getting this information instantly helps me learn immediately if what I’m doing is a correct choice or off base, so I can make adjustments and (hopefully) score better results.

It means I can have students internalizing key photography elements in one day instead of a week or more.

There’s a couple downsides, of course.

When you enable instant gratification you enable an instant pause on taking more shots. It’s easy for a beginner to overthink settings and stare at that little LCD, wondering what needs tinkering until they’re out of time.

When you enable infinite (or close enough) capacity you enable a surplus of identical shots, making weeding through them a more difficult process.

You’d think these two problems would cancel each other out, and sometimes they do. Most times, the pendulum swings hard in one direction or another.

And then, of course, there’s the student who’s told to hand in their “best 10 shots” so they take exactly 10 shots and call it a day. It’s OK, I get it. They don’t actually want to be a photographer, they just picked the lesson they thought was easy.

I still grade it like they took 100 and picked the best 10, though, so they’d better have a very good eye for composition.

Archived: Art

News Review: September 2026

Often, when I’m perusing my RSS feeds looking to learn things and perhaps be inspired to write something here, I find an article where I’ve nothing to add or I’ve already given my two cents a half-dozen times or more.

Rather than just nod thoughtfully and move on to the next story, I thought I’d share a few of them here. I figure I’ll post a collection like this once a month in order to not overdo it.

DIY Photography: Is Photography a Good Career? The Pros, Cons and Reality of Being a Photographer

DIY Photography: Your Photography Could Improve Before You Even Pick Up Your Camera

DIY Photography: Is Spirit Photography Real? The Strange History and Tricks Behind Ghost Photos

DIY Photography: When Technical Knowledge Gets in the Way of a Good Photograph

DP Review: Here’s how a community of photographers keeps their inspiration

PetaPixel: Will Adobe’s AI-Driven, Record-Setting Revenue Ease Wall Street’s Worry?

PetaPixel: Beyond Golden Hour: How to Take Better Landscape Photos All Day

PetaPixel: Photographers Outraged After Heavily AI-Edited Image Wins State Fair Photo Competition

PetaPixel: Stanford AI-Edits Photo to Change Student’s Race and Gender

PictureCorrect: The Easiest Photography Niches to Monetize Without Being “The Best”

PictureCorrect: The Best Photography Habits for Busy People

SLR Lounge: Smoke Photography Tips and Ideas for Incredible Images

Open Culture: The Digital Dada Library: Discover the Archive That Preserves the Original Publications of the Experimental Anti-Art Movement Online

SLR Lounge: My Trick For Getting Kids to Smile Naturally in Photos 99% of the Time

EdSurge: AI Videos Are Warping Early Learning, Teachers Say

EdSurge: New York and Los Angeles Ban Student-Facing AI (For Now). Should Other Schools Follow?

EdSurge: The “October Blues” Are Coming. Here’s How Teachers Can Beat Them.

EdSurge: The Cost of Unchecked Assumptions: Fewer Male Teachers, More Baby Slop

Education Next: Schools of Distraction

Education Next: The Penalty Students Pay for Using AI

The Hechinger Report: OPINION: Our children need more protection from the AI that is teaching them

The Hechinger Report: OPINION: We’ve been treating college as a career plan, but it’s failing too many students

The Hechinger Report: More than half of colleges show signs of money problems. Students will suffer the consequences

The Hechinger Report: The emerging fight against grade inflation in K-12 classrooms

404 Media: There’s a 100% Chance AI Agents Are Already Ruining the Internet

404 Media: ‘Doom Loop’: OpenAI and Microsoft Admits LLMs Are Destroying the Web and Built on Theft

404 Media: How AI Chatbots Are ‘Deskilling’ Human Empathy

Digital Device(ive) Policy

Dan Clark wrote an article for EdSurge in favor of cell phone use in the classroom.

I’ve been back and forth on this issue, myself. For a very long time, I saw the built-in cameras as “good enough” for video and photo content. There were even a handful of decent, free (or “freemium”) video editors for phones and tablets, allowing my students to complete entire video projects without ever needing a desktop or laptop! It was great!

Any time there was talk about a cell ban, I was the one who championed their usefulness to my admin.

I no longer do this.

There’s a few reasons why, and since this is my blog, I get to list them here.

3. Phones have become less useful.

These little computers have gotten much more powerful, to the point where phone processors can power decently specced laptops. That’s great!

… but too many apps want to track everything you do. I can’t in good conscience recommend a student submit to constant tracking to create things.

Not to mention how AI proponents (in their continuing quest to ruin everything) won’t even leave your photos alone when you take them.

2. Older cameras are still great!

I’ve nerded out about bridge cameras already on here so I’ll spare you the brunt of it, but for a fraction of even what a budget phone goes for I can get a used camera that records HD video and has an actual optical zoom lens.

Sure, “the best camera is the one you have,” so if the only one you have is your phone, then fine. My students don’t get to make that claim, because we have a bunch of lab cameras.

They still have to wait their turn, but not because of a lack of devices. It’s because I’m not sending them to scatter around the school to do their recordings.

1. The misuse continued.

I won’t go into the details here, but my argument for constructive, artistic, on-task phone use in my classroom was countered by the students who ended up in an office having to explain to a parent and admin why what they did seemed like a good idea at the time.

Could students make good use with their devices? Absolutely! Many did! Some won awards for their hard work at film festivals!

But too many of them have ruined that for the rest, and we have alternatives in my lab right now that are just as good if not better.

It’s a shame, on a lot of fronts, but in the end it wasn’t my decision.

Honestly, I don’t want that job.

“Creative” Companies Should Pay Creative People

There are few things that make me more upset these days than a company encouraging artists to betray other artists in favor of AI slop. Adobe famously did that, as reported by PetaPixel. (They later tried to clarify what they meant, but in my opinion it did a better push to get photographers off of Adobe products than any ad campaign run by a competitor. Photographers weren’t their target audience, though.)

Well, I’ve found something that’s close. Apparently Ricoh and DJI are fans of using slop in their ads, which is strange as you’d think camera companies should have a photographer or two on the payroll, right?

I’m going to assume that neither company has enough faith in the quality of their hardware to consistently show us images made with their cameras, even cherry-picked ones.

I’d love to end this post on a happier note than this. I want to shout from the rooftops that open source exists, and it does, but open source hardware isn’t so much a thing.

Of course there’s used hardware. Aim for that and not a single penny goes to the manufacturer. That’s getting harder to do, as prices for used equipment continue to increase.

So how about this.

How about we just make art. Let’s celebrate what we can do. It doesn’t need to be perfect. It doesn’t even need to be good. It just needs to be ours.

We don’t need to think about Ricoh, DJI, or even Adobe when we do this. We can use whatever tools we have, perhaps borrowing or loaning things where needs and surpluses exist.

I don’t think that’ll solve the problems here. I don’t know how to do that.

But I know sometimes it’s worthwhile to find one’s joy anyway. I find a lot of mine in art, so I’m going to go make some.

Find your joy.